Evaluation question
Home › Forums › CAVEWAS Forum › Evaluation question
- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 2 months ago by Francois Paradis.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 19, 2023 at 5:49 pm #1918Tamara DaminiParticipant
Hi all,
I was assessing (legal) an individual with significant post-concussion symptoms. After 2.5 hours of interview and some assessments, the individual was becoming so symptomatic that cognitive abilities such as attention and focus were being negatively impacted. At 3 hours we agreed to book a second appointment to finish the rest of the assessments and review the information.
What are your thoughts/opinions on rebooking the person so they could go home to manage their symptoms? Should I have made them stay to see the continued impact of the symptoms?
June 19, 2023 at 8:21 pm #1919Francois ParadisParticipantHello Tami,
Although a vocational evaluation takes place in a controlled environment, we try to emulate work-like conditions to see how the evaluee performs, their positional tolerances, attention span, ability to stay on task and to work at a productive pace (especially on work samples). I would schedule a second session at the point when an evaluee say they cannot continue, at which point test results would have little validity. The important thing is to document everything, their behavior, performance, complaints, etc. How did they feel after the first session? How do they feel during the second session (especially if on consecutive days)? This is all important information to get a sense of their work tolerance (I.E. performing sedentary tasks in an office-like setting). If a person has difficulty doing sedentary tasks for less than 3 hours in a controlled environment, how would they perform in a competitive work setting, with typical work pressures? Hope this helps.
July 19, 2023 at 4:36 pm #1930Marcus BachmannParticipantConcur with Francois’ post. Specifically, a true vocational evaluation – using criterion referenced tests and work samples – simulates work. Therefore, it is not useful (or ethical!) to have the evaluee stay and see how bad it gets; rather, if three hours of sedentary activity causes them to become so symptomatic they cannot continue “working”, it speaks to their overall work capacity. Also, as François noted, their ability to recuperate can also be assessed if they come back on a later (or consecutive) date. I will often follow-up with an evaluee to see how they felt later and how long it took to return to baseline. This has implications for their ability to sustain full-time work or work on consecutive days.
July 19, 2023 at 4:40 pm #1931Tamara DaminiParticipantThanks for the feedback – I agree that this is relevant feedback about work tolerances and there is no benefit in expecting the individual to “push through”.
September 14, 2023 at 10:45 am #1935Jennifer GriffithsParticipantGreat comments and suggestions all. I would add that it is important to get a solid picture of the person’s life at the time of the assessment and document that. What is a typical day like, what do they do, what does a bad day look like, etc. Then compare those reports with what you see in the testing to provide some comparison or alternatively consistency. I agree, our job is to get the best performance out of the person, if they are struggling too much the testing is invalid.
September 14, 2023 at 4:42 pm #1944Francois ParadisParticipantThere are a couple things I do to assess client symptoms. I ask them to give me a range for each symptoms (bad day vs good day) on a scale of 0-10. I also ask them to rate their symptoms (same scale) at the start and the end of the evaluation. This helps understand how/if their symptoms progress during the assessment. I also take note of their behaviour during the assessment and the level of accommodation they needed to complete tasks. With personal injury cases, it is common to observe an aggravation of pain and fatigue. Gathering all this data helps, along with other sources (i.e. medical reports, work and/or school experience post injury) to get a sense of the person’s level of function.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.